Claude Code 团队如何做代码审查
Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang
Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 与 Qing Wang 认为，“有没有人读过代码”并不能准确代替“这次改动可能出什么问题，以及该由自动检查还是人工检查来抓住它”。他们把审查从写完代码、开 PR、等同事的末端关卡，改成类似边写边做拼写检查的持续过程。多数改动在请人查看前已至少被 Claude 审查并修正过一次，从而拦住常见错误，把团队注意力留给更高层的审视。
16th October 2026
We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"
Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.
Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.
— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review
来源：Simon Willison · simonwillison.net